What every Science in Sport customer is asking, across all twelve months of the racing calendar.
This document answers one question: what is each SiS customer actually asking, and when?
There are two lenses. The five personas are the human, motivational view: who these athletes are and what drives them. The four database segments are the behavioural, commercial view: what each person is worth and what job they represent. Use the personas to decide what to say. Use the segments to decide how and when to convert.
The strategic spine: SiS's biggest white space is not a product gap, it is a content and framing gap. The athlete's most-asked questions, "how much do I need," "will it sit right in my stomach," "is it actually proven," "am I wasting money," map almost exactly onto the things SiS has the authority to own but does not yet lead with. SiS already makes the products and holds the science. The opportunity is to answer the questions, in the athlete's own language, at the moment they ask them.
One truth runs underneath all of it. The SiS athlete is proof-driven, not emotion-driven. They research before they buy, they distrust hype, and they want to be shown evidence, not sold a dream. Everything below is built for that person.
30s to 40s · serious club runner or age-grouper · trains hard, says little
Emotional driver: private mastery. Wants to know they are improving, for themselves, not for an audience. "I don't need everyone to know I'm training. I just need to know I'm improving." The single best fit for SiS's secret-weapon positioning: the quiet edge, not the loud logo.
What they're asking:
Rising demand: "Carbs per hour" and "gut training" are among the fastest-climbing endurance-fuelling searches. This persona drives them.
Peak moments: Spring marathon block (February to April) and autumn marathon block (August to October), when training intensity and fuelling questions peak together.
Any age · event-led · one big goal, lots of fear
Emotional driver: reassurance. Has signed up for the big one, often for charity, and is quietly terrified of the wall, the stomach, and getting it wrong on the day. Wants a plan they can trust, in plain English, without feeling like a beginner.
What they're asking:
Rising demand: Huge January and post-ballot spikes (London Marathon ballot results land in the winter, triggering months of anxious searching). Largest overlap with the Dormant base.
Peak moments: January goal-setting, then the 16-week build to spring and autumn races. Great North Run (September) pulls a second wave of first-timers.
30s to 50s · sportive and road cyclist · marginal gains, watts and grams
Emotional driver: optimisation. Treats fuelling as a system to be solved. Knows their FTP, wants to know their carb rate. Will happily pay for a measurable edge and reads the science before buying.
What they're asking:
Rising demand: "High carb fuelling," "80g/100g/120g per hour" and "dual carb" are strongly rising, driven by the pro-peloton trend going mainstream. This persona is the early adopter.
Peak moments: Sportive season (May to August), with the build starting in early spring. Anchored by SiS's British Cycling relationship and Sir Chris Hoy.
30s to 50s · multisport age-grouper · three disciplines, one stomach
Emotional driver: control over complexity. Juggling swim, bike and run means fuelling is the hardest variable to get right. Wants a dialled, rehearsed plan that survives the transition from bike to run without blowing up.
What they're asking:
Rising demand: "Ironman nutrition plan," "triathlon fuelling" and "heat fuelling" rise sharply through the summer race season. Directly served by the new British Triathlon partnership and the Triathlon Race Packs (Sprint and Standard).
Peak moments: Triathlon season (May to September), with the heaviest planning in spring as athletes lock their race-day strategy.
40s and up · masters athlete · training around work and family
Emotional driver: reliability without faff. Limited time, zero tolerance for anything that goes wrong. Wants products that just work, sit well, and need no fuss. Stomach comfort and trust matter more than novelty.
What they're asking:
Rising demand: "Female athlete fuelling," "perimenopause and running," and masters-specific questions are an emerging, under-served and fast-rising cluster, the freshest white space of any persona.
Peak moments: Year-round, with life-stage and "is it worth it" questions spiking at January reset and September "second season" moments. The natural audience for SiS's 2026 female-specific fuelling research.
The personas tell us who people are. The segments tell us what they're worth and what job each represents commercially. Every activation should be built for one of these four.
4,530 people (~1% of base) · ~£563 LTV · highly engaged
The job: protect and deepen. These are the believers. Cross-sell the full system, convert to subscription, widen the basket, and turn them into advocates whose reviews and word of mouth recruit the next cohort.
What they're asking: What's new? What should I add to my race-day kit? Best bundle or subscription value? What are the pros using this season?
Peak: Year-round, with race-season and new-product spikes. Most responsive to early access and loyalty.
33,556 people (~7.6%) · the growth engine · "show me it works"
The job: convert up the value curve. The single most important commercial group. They have bought, they are open, and they respond to proof. Move them from occasional to committed with evidence: race-day wins, the science, the elite validation.
What they're asking: Does this actually work for someone like me? What should I use for my next race? Is the premium product worth it over the basic one? What do other age-groupers rate?
Peak: Tracks the racing calendar. The highest-leverage single moment across the whole base is the purchase-one-to-two within 30 days: turning a first-time buyer into a repeat buyer before they drift.
14,168 people (~3.2%) · slipping away
The job: win back before they lapse. Bought once or twice, then went quiet. A timely, proof-led nudge tied to their next likely race goal can re-engage them before they become dormant.
What they're asking: Is there anything new worth coming back for? Did I get the most out of what I bought? What would actually help my next race?
Peak: Pre-season re-engagement windows (January and late summer), when a new goal gives a natural reason to return.
387,781 people (~88.1%) · ~£1 AOV · the sleeping giant
The job: win the first or second purchase. The overwhelming majority of the base, mostly one-time or never-activated buyers. The prize is not a clever campaign, it is trust: lower the risk, prove it works, answer the beginner questions honestly, and convert event-led intent (a marathon entry, a first triathlon) into a first real order.
What they're asking: What should I take? Is it worth it? Where do I start? Can I trust this brand? What do people like me use?
Peak: Strongest at January goal-setting and around big mass-participation events (London Marathon, Great North Run), when first-timers come looking for a plan.
Endurance demand is driven by the racing season, and it arrives early, because athletes buy during the 12 to 16-week training block, not race week. The calendar below maps the question to the month it is searched, which is weeks ahead of the race itself.
| Month | Questions searched | Who peaks | SiS leans in |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | "How do I start training for a marathon?" · "best fuelling for beginners" · "carbs per hour explained" | First-Time Marathoners, Dormant base, returning athletes | Plain-English "start here" fuelling guidance, the Science of Fuelling launch |
| February | "marathon fuelling plan" · "how to carb load" · "how to train my gut" · "avoid hitting the wall" | Quiet Racers, First-Time Marathoners deep in the build | Gut training, BETA Fuel education, race-day fuelling plans |
| March | "race week nutrition" · "how many gels for a marathon" · "carb loading 3 days before" | Spring marathoners and half-marathoners | Race-day countdown content, GO and BETA combination |
| April | "London Marathon fuelling" · "what to carry on race day" · "gels that don't upset stomach" | Everyone running spring, plus the huge London halo audience | Race-day proof, stomach-comfort reassurance, "no bonk" testimonials |
| May | "best electrolytes" · "sportive fuelling" · "triathlon nutrition plan" | Data-Driven Cyclists, Triathletes, Active Buyers | Hydration, BETA Fuel 80, Triathlon Race Packs, dual-carb education |
| June | "fuelling in the heat" · "how much sodium do I need" · "sweat rate" | Triathletes, cyclists, summer-event athletes | GO Hydro, electrolyte and sodium science, heat-fuelling guides |
| July | "Ironman nutrition" · "70.3 fuelling" · "long ride fuelling" · "travel race fuelling" | Triathletes and cyclists at the season's height | Full race-day systems, on-the-go formats |
| August | "autumn marathon training" · "ultra fuelling" · "how to get back into training" | Quiet Racers and returning athletes starting the autumn block | Autumn race-prep content, gut-training restart |
| September | "Great North Run fuelling" · "half marathon nutrition" · "autumn marathon plan" | First-Timers (Great North Run), Quiet Racers, full racing base | Half and full marathon fuelling, first-timer reassurance |
| October | "marathon race-day fuelling" · "ultra nutrition strategy" · "recovery after a long race" | Autumn marathoners, ultra runners, longevity-minded masters | Race-day proof, REGO recovery, ultra and high-carb fuelling |
| November | "off-season nutrition" · "base training fuelling" · "best recovery protein" | Champions planning ahead, masters athletes, gift-buyers | Recovery, consistency, subscription and system-building |
| December | "endurance nutrition gifts" · "New Year running goals" | Champions (gifting), and everyone pre-resolution | Gift bundles, subscriptions, seeding the January "new season" story |
The year-round thread: science and proof-seeking never stop, and the 2026 female-specific fuelling research (Morton, McColgan, Holly Archer) is the freshest, most ownable narrative of the year. It cuts across every month and speaks directly to the fastest-rising, least-served question cluster in the category.
Cross-referenced to the competitive landscape. These are the highest-value questions to own, where real, rising demand meets a SiS content or framing gap.
| Question cluster | Content gap | Product / framing gap | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| "How much carb / sodium do I specifically need?" | No personalised guidance journey | Has calculators, but no sweat / sodium planner tool. PF&H owns this via sweat testing | Highest |
| "Will this sit right in my stomach?" | Stomach comfort is the strongest review theme but scattered, not led with | Not a headline brand claim, despite being the single most-repeated customer proof point | Highest |
| "How do I train my gut to take more carbs?" | Gut training exists as scattered articles, not a guided programme | No structured "gut-training plan" product or journey | High |
| "Am I wasting money?" | No honest cost-per-session or value education | Styrkr undercuts on price with the same dual-carb claim; SiS does not reframe value | High |
| "Is there fuelling research for women / masters athletes?" | Thin female-specific and life-stage content | Range fits, but framing is not yet built around the female-specific science | High (rising fastest) |
| "What do I actually take, and when?" | No simple "start here" plan for the first-timer | No shop-by-race or guided race-day plan builder | High |
The questions endurance athletes ask most, how much do I need, will it sit right, is it proven, am I wasting money, where do I start, map almost exactly onto the content and tools SiS is missing. SiS already holds the science, the Informed Sport trust, the elite proof and the products. The demand is for guidance, personalisation, stomach-comfort reassurance and honest value, framed in the athlete's own language at the moment they ask.
Close that gap, and SiS answers the highest-volume, highest-trust questions in the category, and becomes not just the brand with the best science, but the brand that answers the question. That is what "You can't beat the science" looks like when it is pointed at the customer instead of the lab.